On St, 2016-02-17 at 05:52 +0000, Christopher wrote:
> I just ran into this:
> It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and
> other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the
> between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools,
> like gpg-agent, are tailored for gpg2.
> RHEL/CentOS has shipped /usr/bin/gpg with gnupg2 since at least
> sometime in
> I'm not saying we shouldn't continue to ship gnupg1, but can we at
> rename it, so gnupg package is version 2, and gnupg1 provides
> instead? This seems overdue. Is there any reason not to do this?
I am in favor of changing the default too. The question is whether it
is not too late for Fedora 24 as I'd say this should be a Fedora
Change and we are past the deadline for Changes proposals. So this
will have to be postponed to Fedora 25.
Yeah, I'm in favor too. Perhaps you could file this change/start
working on it just after we branch f24?