On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
>> not a good tool for spec maintenance.
>
> Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to
> have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into
> %changelog.
+1, for me - GIT is the authority for change logs, not SPEC...
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
A database's (git), temporary meta information is irrelvant.