On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards:
continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be
secondary to our primary deliverables". (Yes, I'm aware of the
KDE-as-release-blocker rule and we'll address that individually).
So new spins and existing Spins are fine (in my opinion) as long as
someone is caring for and feeding them.
Thanks, that's good news.