On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:17 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 20-12-18 10:54, Raphael Groner wrote:
>> So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete stuff?
>> I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
>
> My vote would go for Pull Requests to give the packagers a (limited) chance to look
into the proposal individually. Maybe after some elapsed time have waited, you or someone
else could just merge with the force of provenpackager.
Ugh no I maintain somewhere between a 100 and 200 packages in Fedora,
just push the changes directly please. 100-200 pull-reqs is going to
be a big pain.
Even just deleting all the notifications from them, without maybe
also accidentally deleting a non automated pullreq is goind to be
a big pain.
So I say +100 to just pushing the changes directly, as said
people can always revert them.
Maybe add a note in the changes page about this and a link
to the changes page in the spec file changelog, something like:
-For more info see: http://....
+1000000
Please, just push the changes. We'll all get notified anyway via
fedmsg or other means that a change has been pushed. The PR-based
method was too obnoxious when it was done for the Python dependency
change.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!