On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:41 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com> wrote:
On 31. 03. 20 10:36, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> I respect that there is disagreement but Gitlab is the choice we are making.

I always try to assume good intentions, but this is very hard now. I understand
this statement as follows:

"After collecting the requirements, we have not discussed the decision with the
Fedora community, it was discussed in private.
 
The requirements were analysed in private which we indicated they would be evaluated by the CPE Management. 

We have decided for Gitlab and
only once we have already decided, we have announced our decision to Fedora.
 
We have announced our decision to all stakeholders. 

Now
when the people who will be actually using the thing are trying to participate
in the discussion, their arguments no longer matter to us, because the decision
was already made, whatever you say won't change it, this discussion is pointless."

The thoughts and arguments matter and will influence how the technical implementation will go for us. I already have pulled some good information from the responses for our consideration. It's not altering the decision as the overall balance of requirements is still pointing to Gitlab as the choice. 

Am I wrong?

Yes. 

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


--

Leigh Griffin

Engineering Manager

Red Hat Waterford

Communications House

Cork Road, Waterford City

lgriffin@redhat.com    
M: +353877545162    
 IM: lgriffin