On Do, 02.07.20 12:46, Peter Robinson (pbrobinson(a)gmail.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:19 AM Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
> On 30.6.2020 22:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> >> sd-boot is already installed on end users system, is light weight
> >> compared to Grub ( sd-boot only supports uefi,smaller code size, easier
> >> to maintain ).
> > And that is exactly the problem, systemd-boot has only a small fraction of
> > the feature set of GRUB. That is what makes it so small. I do not see what
> > value it would provide over GRUB-EFI.
> > In addition, as far as I know, systemd-boot is not compatible with the
> > "Secure Boot" shim.
> sd-boot works fine with secure boot but good point I'll add a test case
> for that and check if it's not working.
Is that with self enrolled keys or is it now signed with the MS keys
through the official process?
It's up to the distro to sign it, it supports the shim though.
Lennart Poettering, Berlin