On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:14:14PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl writes:
Pfff, now I'm confused. Here is a case where systemd-resolved implements the standard, and some people were unhappy because they were relying on sloppy implementations which don't follow the RFC.
Yes, welcome to software development!
Sometimes people care about the standard and sometimes the standard isn't helpful. You can bemoan it, or belittle the users as you are doing here, but *that's how it is*.
I agree, but I was replying to a mail which said that systemd-resolved does not follow the standard. In *this* particular case, that complaint is off target.
The only way you can find out which approach to take is to *figure out what the people in the space expect*. In other words, it requires human contact and understanding of the problems - not just guessing in a vacuum.
There is more than one space... and different people have different expectations. What systemd-resolved was doing seems the appropriate thing for 90% of cases, but we also implemented an opt-in for the other behaviour. So I don't think you're being fair when you're saying "[I] bemoan it, or belittle the users", since I implemented the opt-in and I didn't even say anything about the users.
Zbyszek