Re: RHEL 9 and modularity
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 07:12:09AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18. 06. 20 21:22, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > The introduction
> > > > of default module streams was a direct result of wanting to help
> > > > customers that are used to running 'yum install mariadb'
still be able
> > > > to do that.
> > >
> > > Hello Josh.
> > >
> > > I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
despite
> > > their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
> > > reasoning behind it.
>
> Hi Josh, Miro,
>
> I think there has been a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure Miro's
> question is about "default modules" not "default streams"
> (i.e. "modules enabled by default" vs. "the stream of a module to
use
> when a different one is not explicitly selected").
> Default streams are not subject of much discussion. There is no plan
> to limit them either in Fedora or ELN. But from your reply it is not
> clear which of those you have in mind. Let's please clarify what we're
> talking about first...
Could you clarify more then? What is a "default module"? One that is
in the non-modular buildroot?
Please disregard. I got the terminology wrong.
Zbyszek