On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dne 24. 06. 20 v 15:47 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 24. 06. 20 14:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Having python27 and python36 modules is fail, because these should be
>> 2.7 and 3.6 streams of python module.
> Oh. We are so sorry for the failure. Could you please report is as a
> bug in RHEL 8 and explain why it is a problem?
If you have not stripped the context, it would be more obvious.
There is no philosophical (or design?) reason to not have Python 2.7 and
3.6 streams in one module. There are just technical reasons, such as
that you want to install them in parallel which is not possible.
My CentOS 8.2 system with Python 2.7, 3.6, and 3.8 all simultaneously
installed disagrees with this statement. Modularity makes no effort to
hide the complexity of parallel installability. It only helps make
clearer how to handle availability of multiple sets of content from a
repository. Parallel installability is up to the module author.
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!