On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:51 PM Randy Barlow
<bowlofeggs(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> cough cough errata cough cough
>
> Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora
> and internally in Red Hat is intriguing.
I did think about Errata tool* a bit back when I worked on Bodhi. I
like the idea of sharing code on one hand, but on the other hand it is
pretty oriented towards workflows that are designed for a product
release cycle. Bodhi is designed around community feedback (and now CI
feedback).
It could be interesting to hold a chat with the Errata tool developers
to see if there is interest in sharing tooling, but it may be a lot of
effort to make Errata tool flexible enough to support two pretty
different workflows. I'd be willing to have that conversation; I could
be wrong.
Why not go the other way? Bodhi could be extended to support the
internal product workflows.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!