01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote:

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:

I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant
and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example.
LibreOffice was introduced to our live images and we hit target 1GB,
do you really think it could be useful having a larger image just
because you want to provide both of the office suites?

The proposal explicitly says that it doesn't envisage including OO on
any images or in any default install configurations, simply adding it as
an option in the package repositories.

Which doesn't really need a FESCo approval ... just a package review.

Meantime there one sentence which optionally require changes in LibreOffice too: " The /usr/bin/soffice alias is still a problem since (in the Fedora packages) it would conflict between LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice: it is recommended to fix it in the LibreOffice packages too, at least using the Alternatives system."

I think it should be approved first if it really required.