It might be that you are right, dunno, this is just so weird. My point is just that three simple reviews might be less work than to discuss this until there is a Proper Solution.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@gmail.com> wrote:
No top-posting in fedora-devel :)
Sorry :)Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring a new review is, well, somewhat formal.
That said, it should be easy to review these to resolve this issue. If you just make some new review requests, linking to the previous review I'll guess this could be handled without to much problems.
I don't see anywhere in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
That a new review is needed,
"Reviews are currently done for totally new packages, package renames, and packages merged from the old Fedora Core repository."
I don't see this case, fits any of the cases.
Tim