On Tue, 24.08.10 16:54, Matthew Miller (mattdm(a)mattdm.org) wrote:
> While I think this is a good idea I am concernced a bit that
> me responsible for stuff I am not willing to take responsibility
> of. i.e. if something from this list is broken, but it isn't systemd's
> fault then this should not be a reason to drop systemd from F14. Also,
> some of this I am not really able or willing to test (iscsi...), so I
> don't want to be responsible to fix this.
This isn't personal. It's a list of requirements that indicate where we need
to be in order to ship systemd as the default in Fedora 14. It doesn't
matter whose "fault" it is -- if it doesn't work, we can't ship it
Great, I geuss I'll become an X hacker then. Apparently if KMS is borked
it's now my duty to fix it. Yay!
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.