On 11/12/19 2:21 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
However, I believe there's a third option here. It could be as
simple as
providing a python3-static in addition, and NOT using `alternatives`.
Is that an option, though? From the discussion, I was under the
impression that static vs dynamic python affected whether or not python
extensions need to be linked to libpython*.*m.so. I'm unclear on that,
though because I see some modules today that aren't linked to that
library, though most of the ones I checked are.