On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 14:32 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
There's an article on Ars as well. The "working with Fedora
claim is probably a misunderstanding on Softpedia's part; it's not
true, and I doubt Canonical would have said that.
Just for the record... the Softpedia article doesn't actually say
"Canonical state that they have been working with Fedora developers to
make this the universal packaging format." It does say they've been
"working for some time with developers from various major GNU/Linux
distributions" and that "the Snap package format is working natively on
popular GNU/Linux operating systems like [...] Fedora [...]," so it's
clear why there was confusion, but it doesn't say that they've been
working with Fedora specifically.