-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-devel-list-admin(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
admin(a)redhat.com] On Behalf Of Sean Middleditch
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 1:47 PM
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: RE: Fedora Project: Announcing New Direction
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 14:37, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> Actually, RHL is taking the same exit from the open source community
that
> SCO did. RHL wants to be commercial and one of the obstacles to being
> commercial is to have your source being developed by the open source
> community (that doesn't mean that it is bad in anyway), because you
don't
> control the license or the patent so you are limited as to what you can
> charge i.e. RHL can only profit from support and not from the sell of
the
> product. So the model is to drop the open source community and adopt a
> product which you license and patent and raise the price. Exactly what
SCO
> did.
What the heck are you smoking? Fedora is 100% open source. Redhat's
commercial product is the exact samething, just with older/more-tested
packages and some tweaks, for the most part. If I recall, RHEL is
*also* 100% open source. There is no dumping of open source anywhere in
this picture.
Fedora Linux *is* "Redhat Linux", just with a different name and a
*more* open development model.
Sheesh.
--
Sean Middleditch <elanthis(a)awesomeplay.com>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.
--
The question is "What are you smoking". If that was the case why make the
change????????