On 3/22/19 3:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 3/21/19 5:45 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:18 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>> On 2/18/19 12:56 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>>> Would someone please give them a kick?
>> For some reason autosign likes to not process these correctly.
>> I've retagged them to get it to do another pass...
>> Sorry for not fixing them sooner.
> Looks like another Ceph build is stuck.
> Would someone kick it please? Thanks
Fixed, and I looked and asked upstream and this is fixed in sigul 1.0.
So, hopefully we won't have to keep doing this too much longer.
Hey Kevin, might I ask what fp.o is using for hosting sigul or package
signing these days? I have a private setup that works on EL7 using a
special builder-rpms.repo, thanks to your help some years ago, but that
version seems to be quite dated now. I've tried recently putting both
on F29 but the Server was an absolute no go -- IIRC due to the whole
gpgme incompatibilty mess. I can get the Bridge to run on F29 but it
goes wonky if left inactive for too long ... something like overnight is
enough. Meanwhile, things like  make it look orphaned (see Assignee)
and FTBFS for F30 .