On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 6:23 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please report it
against appropriate package.
Could you please confirm if these two issues should really be reported
before I submit them to Bugzilla?
Problem 3: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
whois-nls = 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
- whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
Problem 4: package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires
libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64
- exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
If that's the case, do I file the bug reports as Fedora 30 for whois
and darktable components, respectively? Is it enough to just mention
The problems 1 and 2 not listed above are related to rpmfusion repos
so I supposed I should ignore them for now.