On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 30. 03. 20 13:52, Petr Pisar wrote:

If I undeestand the proposal correctly there there will be an ELN branch or
a name space. But not by default. Only for those packages that reject the
change in Fedora.

I wonder where is this coming from, because that's exactly what we want and
exactly what the change owners don't want.

That's my impression from Alexandra's replies. I think she wrote that packages
that must significantly differ from Fedora will have an ELN override. So
I conclude their sources must be somewhere stored. And since Koji does not
allow building from a non-dist-git, It must be in the dist-git.

The way I understood it, the "ELN override" Alexandra described was using `%if %rhel` (or sometimes `%if %eln`) conditionals directly on the master branch.

Tomas

I frankly cannot see how the create-a-pull-request-and-wait-for-the-merge
procedure would scale if the ELN maintainer would need to adjust more than
a few packages.

The easiest way would be probably allow building ELN from pull-requests. But
the maintainability would be terrible.

-- Petr

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org