On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:30 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> My point is that we have to dedicate a team to work on Pagure, I would
> rather have these people working on improving the infrastructure so
> that we don't need these heroics to happen. If we don't put people to
> work on Pagure it will end up being another fedora-packages, badges or
> FAS and in couple years it will be too difficult to do anything with
> it. It is not only about Pagure, for example I would love to be able
> to replace Bodhi with something that we don't have to maintain but it
> is much more difficult to find an alternative to Bodhi
cough cough errata cough cough
Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in Fedora
and internally in Red Hat is intriguing.
Do you really think the entire CPE team is blissfully unaware of Errata
Tool's existence? I mean, is that really the scenario that makes the
most sense in your head, as opposed to 'they have already considered it
but don't find it a suitable replacement'?
You might ask 'why not errata
tool?', but it seems pretty silly to just assume that they don't even
know it exists, or something.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net