On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:01 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:14 AM Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:29:11AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > * Fedora wants to use the latest version of an upstream, but ELN wants
> > > to stay on LTS releases (e.g. Firefox)
> >
> > Can we provide these things as modules and make them available in both?
> > Firefox LTS seems like an ideal candidate, and I can see someone on Fedora
> > Linux wanting the option and if the ELN folks are maintaining a package
> > _anyway_....
> >
>
> Firefox ESR can be packaged separately anyway as a "firefox-esr" package...
>
Please don't fixate on the use of Firefox as the example.
That is like saying 'dont think about polar bears' to most humans. I will morph his comment
<LTS package> can be packaged separately anyway as <package-lts>.
or to use Matt's version:
<LTS package> could be packaged separately anyway as <package-module>.
The issue with this suggestion is:
== Who is going to do that work? ==
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure