On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 8:02 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:31:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier if the "default stream" would just behave like
> a regular package?
Part of the "hybrid modularity" proposal was that the default stream could
_literally_ be tagged into the base repo as non-modular. That has a lot of
appeal to me still!
To quote you from the other ongoing thread: "The default stream for a
package shouldn't be updated in disruptive ways in shipped releases"
If that's the case, then what *is* the benefit of abandoning the
non-modular version of packages, if default streams need to basically
be maintained separately for different branches anyway? 🤔
> > We put the default modular stream into our regular repos, similarly
> > to what we try to do in the buildroot. "dnf install Foo" would
> > install the Foo package and would not enbale any streams or modules.
> > The modular maintainers would keep maintaining the modules as now,
> > the infrastructure would compose the defaults into the regular repo
> > (or an additional but default-enabled one).
> Yeah, like this. :)
> Matthew Miller
> Fedora Project Leader
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: