On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Matthew Garrett mjg59@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:52:25PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Matthew Garrett mjg59@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again? Bugzilla isn't a discussion forum. If disagree with a deliberate policy decision, discuss it on an appropriate mailing list.
Isn't that what we're doing? That's exactly the point of this email thread.
No, this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion - anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the people who actually work on that code. In any case, I was disagreeing with Rahul's assertion that he was justified in re-opening a bug merely because he disagreed with a design choice.
(Please trim the emails you're replying to. It's a pain to have to cut out my own signature just to make the mail coherent in isolation) -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This is a wider audience. I believe this was a better group of people to ask.
Dan