El vie., 26 jun. 2020 a las 8:10, Ankur Sinha (<sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com>)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 23:38:13 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:21:37 +0200, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I'm not sure why you think end-users can't use a free OS.
> First steps of end-users is to install Chrome, Spotify and VirtualBox.
> So there is left no advantage of a Free OS.
That's anecdotal generalisation at best. I know enough people to
disprove this statement using my set of anecdotal evidence---and it
won't get us any where.
We are a FOSS community and we will keep promoting FOSS as much as
we can. It is our First Foundation:
So, let's keep the discussion on topic: about the default editor.
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
Time zone: Europe/London
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Again, I'm not against the proposal, but I would prefer a better and sane
Honestly most end users dislike the CLI.
However I understand that discussion is not about "what is my preferred
I understand that discussion is "if by chance an end user has to use CLI,
he/she will not know what/how to do with vim".
In such a case nano is easier (regardless that the argument about how hard
is quitting vim is exaggerated, Ctrl+o is not easier that ZZ).
A better for a newcomer that faces cli would be something like mcedit, but
sadly it is not a standalone editor.
But please, again, most end users prefer to use a gui editor. Is not about
that a newcomer has to know **what** is KWrite/Kate/Gedit/etc, it's about
that choices are of easy access through KDE/GNOME/MATE/XFce/etc graphical
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org