On 2/28/19 18:05, Miro HronĨok wrote:
On 28. 02. 19 16:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
> More generally, the *flood* of Python 2 dep issues here is something I
> was definitely concerned about with the Python 2 retirement policy
> explicitly deciding not to say anything about obsoleting Python 2
> subpackages :(
I wanted the py3 packages to obsolte the py2, but i was outvoted.
I completely agree with you. I think you should have gone to FESCo and
ask them to overrule the FPC in this case.
It's difficult to obsolete subpackages correctly from
fedora-obsolete-packages when F29 keeps moving and bumping package
versions; the versioned obsoletes in fedora-obsolete-packages
don't stay current for very long like this. It would be much easier and
much more correct to do "Obsoletes: python2-blah < %{version}-%{release}"
from the same package spec file.
Kalev