2017-07-14 19:05 GMT+02:00 Debarshi Ray <rishi.is(a)lostca.se>:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> > their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> > packaging.
> At least we see where this is going.
> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
Is this really more reliable than using dnf (for graphical packages
like Recepies and Builder)? What exactly is it that makes flatpaks
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org