On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
<nkadel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>> <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the
proper
>>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
>>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
>>> >
>>>
>>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.
>>
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22
>
> So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to
> describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to
"numerical
> equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it
> for kernel.ll other packages unmodified?
That came out somewhat garbled.
Why not simply alter it for kernel.spec, and leave alone other
packages that may use the same macro?
This seems to be misunderstanding. This has
nothing to do with kernel.spec
in particular. That PR trims _all_ changelogs, on purpose.
Zbyszek