On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:09:13 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
Even if that is true, what is your point?
That you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no longer active?
FOUR DAYS is "no longer active" for you? Seriously? You want to STFU those who disagree _this hard_?
-- Pete