On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Sahana Prasad <sahana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
Hi all,
FTBFS bugs have been reported for all those packages that failed to build
with
OpenSSL 3.0.0. Attached list of failed packages and logs [1].
Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad
Thank you,
Regards,
Sahana Prasad
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Sahana Prasad <sahana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in
>> rawhide now.
>> > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now.
>> >
>> > The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them.
>>
>> I have switched the following packages to OpenSSL 1.1 explicitly as they
>> will
>> not support OpenSSL 3.0:
>>
>> python2.7
>> python3.7
>> python3.6
>> pypy
>> pypy3.7
>>
>> See an example PR for inspiration:
>>
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.6/pull-request/36
>>
>> The constrict is compatible with Fedora 33-35 as well.
>>
>> It is not compatible with RHELs, but if deemed necessary, we can add
>> openssl1.1
>> matapackage to EPEL.
>>
>> I've also requested the openssl1.1-devel provide to be added to RHEL 8,
>> but it
>> might be rejected or take a long time:
>>
>
> Hi Miro,
>
> Thanks for reporting this RFE. We have decided to provide support for it.
>
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Sahana Prasad
>
>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006238
>>
>> --
>> Miro Hrončok
>> --
>> Phone: +420777974800
>> IRC: mhroncok
>>
>>