Hi everyone,Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages toavoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
Thank you,Regards,Sahana PrasadOn Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Sahana Prasad <email@example.com> wrote:On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hello all,
> The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now.
> You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now.
> The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them.
I have switched the following packages to OpenSSL 1.1 explicitly as they will
not support OpenSSL 3.0:
See an example PR for inspiration:
The constrict is compatible with Fedora 33-35 as well.
It is not compatible with RHELs, but if deemed necessary, we can add openssl1.1
matapackage to EPEL.
I've also requested the openssl1.1-devel provide to be added to RHEL 8, but it
might be rejected or take a long time:Hi Miro,Thanks for reporting this RFE. We have decided to provide support for it.Thank you,Regards,Sahana Prasad