I see the trademark difficulty.<br>
<br>
Perhaps &quot;Lite Hat Linux&quot; or something similar would work better? Either
way, I feel that in order to assure such features as compatability,
being up to date, and consistant quality, it is important that whatever
the project be called, it be closely developed with fedora core. Though
Cobind seems neat, and I will probably try it, the combination of
Nautilus+XFCE makes me somewhat nervous. I have used gnome-panel with
KDE, and Kicker with XFCE, but upon lauching nautilus while working on
my FC-LT package selection, I ended with such a mess that it took no
less than 20 minutes to sort out, and I promptly &quot;rpm -e&quot;'d nautilus.<br>
<br>
Also note: I attempted to run GNOME on my dad's p3, 128MB/RAM, computer
last night. Kernel had to kill all processes to free up memory. KDE was
slow, but at least the kernel didn't have to get involved. I'm afraid
GNOME is definately not suited for lower end computers, at least not
yet.<br>
<br>
Also, I like the idea of having other &quot;brands&quot; of &quot;fedora&quot; distros, but
due to Trademarks, perhaps we should take the *** Hat Linux (Audio Hat
Linux? GraphiHat Linux?) naming convention to show the connection w/o
infringing upon trademarks. Just an idea.<br>