On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 14:43 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Excuse my cynicism here but this would also require some change to the QA process itself and what are blockers and what are not and the "nice to have" process which should be renamed "we won't hold our breath".
I don't really see any special place for QA in reviewing design decisions. I've said it before, but my opinion is that the job of QA is to determine whether things are working as intended, not to decide what the intentions should be.
No but if QA had adopted the "keyboard layouts must work" criterion that I have proposed multiple times the anaconda maintainers would have to spent their time on fixing the real issue rather than papering over it in such obscure ways.
Nope. Current anaconda would pass any such criterion. It lets you pick a keyboard layout, and picking a keyboard layout works. I don't think a "there must be a keyboard layout indicator in anaconda" criterion would get accepted.