El vie, 01-09-2017 a las 21:19 +0200, Igor Gnatenko escribió:
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:56 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> <ignatenkobrain(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> > So I think F28/F29 would be best time for retiring YUM. Right now
> > DNF
> > should be already stable and provide same capabilities (or
> > documented
> > that something will not be supported).
> > Hopefully infrastructure / rel-eng folks will finally add support
> > for
> > rich dependencies which would mean that yum will not work in
> > Fedora
> > anyway, so..
> > Do you still have some critical missing functionality in DNF? And
> > let
> > us know reasons why would you like to keep YUM available
> > (hopefully
> > there are no)!
> There is still one thing I've noticed we're missing: API and CLI
> getting package changelogs. This exists in yum but doesn't in
While I agree that this is missing functionality, being honest I
we should educate users to use updateinfo which is meant for users
while changelogs might be interested only for developers. Updateinfo
coming from what is written in bodhi.
> In addition, don't we still need yum in the repositories for mock
> target EL6 and EL7 for EPEL?
I don't think so, but better to ask developers of mock.
yes we do need yum to be around until RHEL 7 goes EOL
> > : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066867
> > are
> > blocked by this bug)
> > --
> > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org