On 04/11/2020 19:46, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 11/4/20 2:10 PM, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> Also I'm suspicious about the quality of that list because it
> includes packages of mine that only use make via cmake and which
> do BR cmake which in turn requires make.
For the purposes of this proposal, your packages still need to
BuildRequires: make. I don't want to depend on this kind of indirect
dependency to keep things working, because it can be fragile.
So instead I'm supposed to somehow know what tools the tools
that I use choose to invoke under the covers? Where does that
insanity end exactly? Do I have to require gas because gcc
will use it to assemble the code it generates?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom(a)compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/