On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done.
remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/
f33
This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide"
branch
subdirectories have been created?
See:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and
"rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on
the old master branch?
Rich.
If everything is implemented as approved by FESCo, "rawhide" is the
successor for "master", with "main" only being a symbolic reference
pointing at "rawhide".
Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug.
Fabio