On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 17:28 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensource(a)till.name) said:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:00:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of
> > "modules
> > like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those
modules share
> > in
> > common that we can define clearly and concisely and in a way
> > there
> > won't be any serious dispute over?
>
> Maybe "packages needed to be able to to use and configure the
> default
> package manager". For example one might need to be able to adjust
> the
> dnf repo config to be able to actually install pkgs, if there is a
> restrictive firewall for example and only local mirrors are
> accessible
> or a proxy has to be used.
I would say "packages needed to be able to install software and then
do
basic configuration of the system" - this would be:
- $package_manager
- core modules from
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_system_mo
dules.html
- core modules from
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_files_mod
ules.html
That seems viable, sure. +1. Would you like to add a comment in comps
and update the group with the appropriate packages, or shall I? Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net