On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:32:58PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com>:
> Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
> Some of these packages have invented home-brewed methods to generate
> the Patch lines in the spec file, eg:
I hope we'll see some progress in RPM in regards to VCS integrations
soon. Because that's the main issue with RPM and related
> More importantly, all are using random git repositories to store the
> exploded tree. This makes it difficult for co-maintainers and proven
> packagers to fit in with the patch management chosen by the
> maintainer. Usually they won't have access to the git repository for
> these patches, making it difficult to add patches and near impossible
> to upgrade to a new version.
I'm using https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/
for that. For example
erlang is stored here:
It contains a mirror of main upstream repo and few branches with
Peter, is the comment in the spec file wrong? It refers to two github
In any case, fedorahosted would be an improvement, but AIUI it doesn't
automatically give access to co-maintainers and proven packagers.
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.