----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin(a)scrye.com>
To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 7:17:24 PM
Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800
> Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take
> > over other's packages.
> >
> > If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
> > the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of
> > packages, that will be helpful.
>
> The plan is to orphan the packages, but leave the old point of contact
> with acls. That way someone active can take over the package, but if
> the old point of contact comes back they can just join right back in.
>
> This way the package gets active folks caring for it and the former
> point of contact can come back anytime.
Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api
to do this, then I was traveling, etc.
It's now been done.
The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at
least one branch:
(Note that many of them have co-maintainers, so do check with them to
see if any of them would like to become the new point of contact):
atlas
Taken by fkluknav
Regards,
--
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience
PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com