On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:25:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 14:10 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> That being the case, I test the package fairly rigorously myself. But
> this process doesn't take that into account. I test far more things
> than you get with a few people just doing smoke tests, but the smoke
> tests are actually the gating factor. If you changed the process so a
> maintainer can indicate they've done their own fairly extensive testing,
> that would satisfy me. But that also opens the door for abuse, so you
> would have to watch maintainers once you enabled this ability.
I've posted in the thread earlier that I'd actually like to do this,
others seem opposed however.
FWIW I'm for it with your explanation and added it to the Update
brainstorming page last night: