On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 15:56 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
<jlanda(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > To me that's the all point of this
> > process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
> > the different options.
> >
>
> Do we *really* *really* need to compete with other full featured git
> forges on features? The ODF says that this is one of the problem. Well,
> imo we don't *really* *really* need to compete with them.
>
It depends on the use case, doing development work projects hosted on
pagure.io is not great in my opinion. In particular working with pull
requests.
In terms of issue trackers, it is missing the ability to visualize
issues
in a board for example.
Again this my opinion and maybe these are maybe not *really* *really*
needed.
I think it depends on the size and scope of your project a bit. I do
find Pagure.io a pretty good host of the projects I have there, as
they're fairly small. But then, an open source (non-enterprise edition)
Gitlab instance would work fine for them too.
> Actually we already have the features that we *really* *really* need.
> Otherwise we could not release fedora using pagure as we are using,
> could we? :)
>
I personally don't think we can release Fedora without people across the
project doing heroics and a crazy amount of hours which seems to have
become a norm rather than an exception.
When that happens it doesn't normally involve Pagure much, though. And
I don't think even an amazing git forge would actually go a long way to
solving the main issues there.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net