On Saturday, July 11, 2020 11:47:30 AM MST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11/07/20 01:44 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>I said that php-fpm was fast than mod_php, however it's just not a huge
When?
I see the opposite claim, repeatedly:
On 10/07/20 18:38 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>They've been running just fine for years. I don't see any reason to lose
>performance to php-fpm's overhead, and lose the stability of mod_php.
On 10/07/20 18:49 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>still works, and it works very well. It has less overhead than php-fpm,
>even!
On 11/07/20 01:09 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>It's not really faster than mod_php
php-fpm is marginally faster than mod_php, in some circumstances, when opcache
is used. However, using php-fpm adds 1ms to every request, as a result of
using FastCGI.
None of this is relevant to the removal of a package which is still working
and widely used, however.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.