Dne 26. 06. 20 v 15:17 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:59:39PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Which is better? default or defaults? I don't have a preference.
> I went with "-defaults" in this case because the package provides
> default configuration", i.e. "defaults".
> This doesn't translate exactly to the nano case, which is about making
> the program the default "plugin" in another program (git).
What about something like "default-editor"?
Shouldn't it be independent package then? Or shouldn't all editors have
subpackage like this?
That way it's more obvious
from the name what it actually does. If we later decide to change the
default editor, we update that package (and spins/labs, power users,
etc can exclude that package in kickstarts if they don't want it)