On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:12:25PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Their FAQ is constantly updated:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ
I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse submitting the
addons that we ship to their signing service or if it is against our
policies; at least mozilla-https-everywhere has been signed.
that would work for Fedora - if it can be guaranteed that they sign new
versions quickly. Immagine if one of our plugins had a security hole and
mozilla would need days or weeks to sign it. As far as I can see Fedora
specific extensions would have to be listed which means they would go
through manual code review at mozilla.
Mozilla states that they will be offering an unbranded binary (en_US
only)
for development and testing purposes.
For me this appears the only possibility and I suspect there are more
Fedora users like me maintaining their own Firefox extensions.
So will we get a firefox-unbranded package?
Richard
--
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers