2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering <mzerqung(a)0pointer.de>:
On Wed, 24.11.10 22:08, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp4x4(a)gmail.com) wrote:
> Someone uses cherokee web server? Please check this service
Looks good (haven't tested it though, and don't really know
cherokee). In this case however, I think it would actually make sense to
use Type=forking and pass "-d". Why? Because another service might want
to access cherokee over HTTP or so and if you don't use Type=forking
then that other service is using After=cherokee.service it might access
it before the server is actually up.
Ok, I changed it to forking (I tried it before and it didn't worked
after reboot - I think that the httpd.socket had something to do with
BTW, is the -C /etc/cherokee/cherokee.conf really necessary?
Independently of systemd i Actually believe we should simplify the
command lines as much as possible, and if /etc/cherokee/cherokee.conf is
the default config file anyway I think it would be nice to drop that
I created second version without "-C /path/to/config" - let maintainer
choose the right version in his opinion.
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
devel mailing list