On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
> As the Source0 provider for the packages and then next to:
>
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2
>
> Add a:
>
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2-bios
>
> And moving the build of all sub-packages which are
> only necessary for BIOS support to the second src.rpm.
>
> This way the Legacy BIOS SIG could maintain
> the grub2-bios src.rpm (and binary pkgs it builds).
Would it not make more sense to rename the locked down grub2 SRPM that will
become UEFI only to grub2-efi and let grub2 be the BIOS one, to match the
naming of the binary RPMs (which are already split)?
The binary RPM for grub's BIOS boot code is grub2-pc (and
grub2-pc-modules), not grub2. But "grub2-pc" is not particularly
descriptive as a source package name, so grub2-bios makes sense for
the source package name if we need to split it.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!