On 07/12/2017 05:44 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
"developers not having to learn GPG to sign their *Flatpak*
I really don't understand how you misinterpreted that sentence so badly,
individual Fedora developers never had to GPG sign their Fedora packages...
That "*Flatpak*" was not in the original sentence and it really confused
me too. I was pretty sure individual maintainers didn't sign the RPMs,
so I wondered why that was a benefit of flatpaks. So now I understand
that the point is that Fedora signs the flatpaks instead of the
developers of the applications.