On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 18:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:00:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > This should have been an announced Change. This is a significant
> > > change with wide impact.
> >
> > I've filed a bug, proposed it as a blocker, and filed a FESCo ticket
> > asking FESCo to designate the bug as a blocker.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274830
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3196
>
> I admit I was also initially surprised. But, this actually has been going
> through the Change process for a while:
>
> F33: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkManager_keyfile_instead_of_ifcfg_rh
> F36: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
> F39: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MigrateIfcfgToKeyfile

I would argue that it has not. Those Changes are all about the
NetworkManager plugin that reads ifcfg files. The network service -
/etc/init.d/network - is a different thing. They may be tied together
in the maintainers' minds, I don't know, but they are not tied together
technically and none of those Changes, IMHO, at all clearly conveys
"the network service is going away in Fedora 40".
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue