On 1/21/21 5:43 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
That's just not acceptable.
Which means that signed RPM contents need to be postponed at least
until all supported Fedora releases have an RPM version that can read
those files.
I'm not sure what Fedora's policy on this is, but as an
administrator
with a mix of Fedora and EL systems, it would be really, really helpful
if RPM in the latest version of EL could parse these RPMS (at least
SRPMS; not sure if they're affected by this change).
--
========================================================================
In Soviet Russia, Google searches you!
========================================================================