On 20. 10. 22 12:11, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Which of the following will happen:
>
> 1) rpm will gain ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches}
> 2) we will stop requiring the above in Rust packages, as Rust is 100% available
> 3) rpm will %ifarch %{rust_arches} this change
> 4) something else (what?)
>
> IMHO if we do 1) we could as well do 2) because without rpm, we won't be able
> to build rpms. 3) seems somewhat tedious for no good reason.
I think 2) would be the easiest solution in the long term. rustc and
LLVM now already support all targets that we*might* want to add in
the near-to-mid-future (riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu comes to mind -
its support is at the same level as other targets we already have).
I've opened
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1220
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok