On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnoticed.
>
> Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages?
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to just drop them before F21. Having
> broken dependencies basically means that the packages are completely
> broken and cannot be installed at all. Not much point in shipping those
> in the repositories ...
>
> Any ideas how to deal with this?
Here's a quick look at some of them.
Note that I'm not a provenpackager, so I can't actually do anything
about it myself.
[...]
>> [cp2k]
>> cp2k-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
>> cp2k-mpich-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
>> cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
>> cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
This hasn't finished building yet, but it seems ok so far:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7881650
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12957/ in testing.
Sorry, it took a while to get elpa building first and then fix the
remaining issues in cp2k build.
Regards,
--
Fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion
http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"